I got into a sustained bout of grumping today (damn.. swore I’d stop doing that when I left Cameroon).
Anyway, the cause of my whinging was a media event happening in London.
It took over my Twitter feed and, whereas I normally get irritated by waves of hashtagged tweets, this time the event seemed of such importance to those attending that they’d gone beyond that.
Conversations were often unprefixed by @ and weren’t even hashtagged. It couldn’t be filtered out. It felt like those involved were saying…the interesting people are here – why don’t the rest of you just go and watch the telly until we’re done.
My annoyance was more than just a bunged up tweet feed. As someone never resident in London it’s very easy to feel excluded from the capital clique. The impression that: *Everyone* means *everyone we know* isn’t far away.
And as for live tweeting in general…
Well I think live tweeting has found its place. Live tweeting is for revolutions. Live tweeting is for events of genuine international significance.
If your event isn’t likely to make prime time breaking news then maybe you should rethink.
Maybe it isn’t of the significance you think it is or hope it to be. Maybe, to put it bluntly, neither are you. Ask yourself how much is info and how much is ego?
Workshops, conferences, parties, launches, presentations and talks are simply not important enough to be live tweeted.
Live blog instead.
Don’t disrespect the live tweet. Save it for revolutions.
from → Social Media
So I think we’re all agreed – the modern journalist should be able to converse with their readers.
They should be able to handle a comment box, a tweet feed etc etc. They should be able to community build, take part in discussions, respect their readership.
A tech journalist, for example, should be able to talk tech – without reverting to calling people “you fucking morons“.
So witness this tirade from Tech Crunch contributor Milo Yiannopoulos:
Would you want to read this man? Would you want to employ this man? Would you want to work with this man?
I understand he’s taking part in the upcoming TEDx Liverpool event. Do you really want him there?
Is he trying to carve out a role as some kind of tech shock jock? Or is he just a wanker?
from → Social Media
Earlier this week I had call to ask what all the #moonfruit tweets were about on Twitter. 
Turns out it was a promotion from a company of the same name that was giving away an Apple computer a day and all you had to do was add #moonfruit to your tweets.
Now, I don’t blame these guys. Smart marketing move – and as I write it’s the top trending topic on Twitter (#iranelection is 7th) so they got it right.
But people mindlessly typing in #moonfruit every few minutes?
Do you know this organisation? Do you know if they do good work? Do you care? Are you really happy to metaphorically reply uh huh okay as they yank your chain and wave Apple products under your nose?
So one free Mac a day? Just what are your chances of winning? How many #moonfruit tweets does it take hit number one in trends?
And just what wouldn’t you tweet for a freebie? How long before all tweets come to you…courtesy of #mcdonalds (tweet this and get a free quarter pounder). Where do you draw the line? Is your 140 characters for hire?
This is has got marketing bandwagon written all over it – they’re all so going to jump on this.
Before long every tweet will be squeezed up in order to hashtag another brand name at the end on the off chance of a free latte or new Barf Flavoured Coca Cola.
Hey we got a new way to talk about what *we* like for a change…oh hang on…Starbucks want me to give them a plug. Mmmm I got a mocha with extra hazelnut syrup. Ah well free speech – fun while it lasted.
This isn’t a charity. It’s people making money and fooling you into advertising their product.
Would you give these people an ad on your blog for the promise of being added to thousand to one draw for an iPod?
What is up with you people?
from → Campaigning, Social Media
